ai-coding-welfare — security grade SAFE, quality 62/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 62/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by panxunying · Codex Skill · ★ 640

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is ai-coding-welfare safe to install? View the security audit →

About ai-coding-welfare

AI Coding 福利站导航 免费额度 · 白嫖 Claude Code / Codex / Cursor 的中转与公益站合集 AgentRouter 注册 · JustDoWork 注册 · RawChat 公益站 注册 · Matrix 注册 · TaBiAI 注册 · GoRouter 注册 🚀 一分钟上车 Anthr

ai-codinganthropicapi-proxyclaude-codecodexfree-apifree-quotallmnew-apiopenai

Quick Facts

Stars640
Forks46
LanguageJavaScript
CategoryCodex Skill
LicenseMIT
Quality Score61.6214568532374/100
Last Updated2026-09-12
Created2026-08-21
Platformsclaude-code, codex, node
Est. Tokens~18k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with ai-coding-welfare for enhanced workflows:

  • cligate — semantic(0.34)+complementary+rare_topics+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (66%)
  • claude-code-cache-fix — semantic(0.29)+complementary+rare_topics+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (65%)
  • dario — semantic(0.28)+complementary+rare_topics+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (64%)

ai-coding-welfare alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a ai-coding-welfare alternative? If you're comparing ai-coding-welfare with other codex skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • holysheep-cli by holysheep123 · ⭐ 292

    🐑 One command to configure all AI coding tools — Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, Cursor, Aider & more

  • pilot-shell by maxritter · ⭐ 2.1k

    Professional context and harness engineering for Claude Code and OpenAI Codex. Build production-grade software

  • dario by askalf · ⭐ 526

    Use your Claude and ChatGPT subscriptions in Cursor, Cline, Aider, Claude Code and the Agent SDK — at subscrip

  • crystal by stravu · ⭐ 3.1k

    (Crystal is now Nimbalyst) Run multiple Codex and Claude Code AI sessions in parallel git worktrees. Test, com

  • agent-of-empires by njbrake · ⭐ 2.4k

    Manage multiple Claude Code, OpenCode agents from either TUI or Web for easy access on mobile. Also supports M

  • vllm-mlx by waybarrios · ⭐ 1.6k

    High-performance OpenAI and Anthropic compatible LLM inference server for Apple Silicon. Native MLX, continuou

More Codex Skill Tools

Explore other popular codex skill tools:

View all Codex Skill tools →

Popular JavaScript Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is ai-coding-welfare?

ai-coding-welfare is AI Coding 福利站导航:免费白嫖 Claude Code / Codex 的中转站与公益站合集,含额度、模型、价格自动更新与一键配置脚本. It is categorized as a Codex Skill with 640 GitHub stars.

What programming language is ai-coding-welfare written in?

ai-coding-welfare is primarily written in JavaScript. It covers topics such as ai-coding, anthropic, api-proxy.

How do I install or use ai-coding-welfare?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the ai-coding-welfare GitHub repository at github.com/panxunying/ai-coding-welfare. The project has 640 stars and 46 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does ai-coding-welfare use?

ai-coding-welfare is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to ai-coding-welfare?

The top alternatives to ai-coding-welfare on Agent Skills Hub include holysheep-cli, pilot-shell, dario. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Codex Skill tools