ai-web3-security — security grade SAFE, quality 42/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 42/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by pashov · Agent Tool · ★ 575

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is ai-web3-security safe to install? View the security audit →

About ai-web3-security

Web3 Security Tools Hub A curated list of AI tools for smart-contract security. Built and maintained by pashov.com. How to choose: 🛠️ Want something you install and run yourself? → Free & Open Source 💼 Want a managed platform or service? → Paid & Closed Source 🔤 Looking for your language? → jump straight from the Contents below.   ⭐ = featured pick Contents Free & Open Source — Solidity / EVM (18) · Rust / Solana (3) · Move/Sui (5) · ZK / Circom (1) · Multi-Language (28) Paid & Closed Source — Solidity / EVM (8) · Rust / Solana (2) · Multi-Language (25) Free & Open Source Solidity / EVM | [Archethe

agent-skillsai-code-reviewai-securityauditingawesome-listblockchain-securitydefi-securityethereum-securityllm-securitysecurity-tools

Quick Facts

Stars575
Forks106
CategoryAgent Tool
Quality Score42.0146017131531/100
Last Updated2026-10-02
Created2026-03-12
Platformsbrowser
Est. Tokens~7k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with ai-web3-security for enhanced workflows:

  • web3-bug-bounty-hunting-ai-skills — semantic(0.60)+complementary+rare_topics+similar_pop+shared_platform (70%)
  • plamen — semantic(0.56)+complementary+rare_topics+similar_pop+shared_platform (69%)
  • nullsec-s1 — semantic(0.58)+complementary+rare_topics+similar_pop+shared_platform (65%)
  • auditor-skill — semantic(0.34)+complementary+rare_topics+similar_pop+shared_platform (61%)

ai-web3-security alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a ai-web3-security alternative? If you're comparing ai-web3-security with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • agentic-radar by splx-ai · ⭐ 1.1k

    A security scanner for your LLM agentic workflows

  • medusa by Pantheon-Security · ⭐ 962

    AI-first security scanner. NEW in v2026.7: Claude Code compromise detection — vet .claude/ hooks, permissions

  • api-relay-audit by toby-bridges · ⭐ 865

    Local security audit for AI API relays and LLM proxies: detects prompt injection, model substitution, tool-cal

  • node9-proxy by node9-ai · ⭐ 216

    Access control for AI agents. Set what Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, Cursor and any MCP server are allowed to do

  • web3-bug-bounty-hunting-ai-skills by awarexone · ⭐ 150

    18 Claude Code skill files for smart contract security — built from 2,749 Immunefi reports, 681 DeFiHack repro

  • awesome-ai-coding-tools by ai-for-developers · ⭐ 2.1k

    A curated list of AI-powered coding tools

More Agent Tool Tools

Explore other popular agent tool tools:

View all Agent Tool tools →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is ai-web3-security?

ai-web3-security is an open-source agent tool by pashov with 575 GitHub stars.

How do I install or use ai-web3-security?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the ai-web3-security GitHub repository at github.com/pashov/ai-web3-security. The project has 575 stars and 106 forks, indicating an active community.

What are the best alternatives to ai-web3-security?

The top alternatives to ai-web3-security on Agent Skills Hub include agentic-radar, medusa, api-relay-audit. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Agent Tool tools