codex-chatgpt-pro-plugin — security grade SAFE, quality 50/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 50/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by pauljunsukhan · Codex Skill · ★ 78

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is codex-chatgpt-pro-plugin safe to install? View the security audit →

About codex-chatgpt-pro-plugin

ChatGPT Pro Line A Codex plugin that gives your agent a direct line to a logged-in ChatGPT Pro session. Codex is great at execution. For the hard parts — architecture, system design, research synthesis, tradeoff calls, gnarly debugging strategy — you sometimes want a second, stronger brain. ChatGPT Pro Line lets a Codex agent phone that brain: it drives a real, logged-in ChatGPT Pro browser session, attaches your repo as context, sends a message, reads the answer, and writes a receipt — no API key, no password handling, no scraped cookies. It's a phone line, not a scraper. Demo ChatGPT Pro line call: Repo monofile attachment: Why The strongest ChatGPT Pro reasoning isn't exposed on the API — it lives in the website. So this bridges to the website, deliberately and safely. The human stays logged in; the automation is text-only and deterministic; and every call is recorded to disk. You get Pro-level collaboration inside your Codex loop without handing an agent your credentials. Use it for high-leverage work — architecture, specs, feature design, research synthesis, tradeoff review, cross-repo planning, and hard debugging strategy. Don't spend the line on trivial syntax checks.

Quick Facts

Stars78
Forks8
LanguageJavaScript
CategoryCodex Skill
LicenseMIT
Quality Score49.8816921825499/100
Open Issues8
Last Updated2026-06-22
Created2026-06-17
Platformscodex, node
Est. Tokens~13k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with codex-chatgpt-pro-plugin for enhanced workflows:

  • hanzi-browse — semantic(0.16)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (51%)

codex-chatgpt-pro-plugin alternative? Top 1 similar tools

Looking for a codex-chatgpt-pro-plugin alternative? If you're comparing codex-chatgpt-pro-plugin with other codex skill tools, these 1 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • theorist by blader · ⭐ 191

    A Codex/Claude skill that maintains per-repo operating theory documents.

More Codex Skill Tools

Explore other popular codex skill tools:

View all Codex Skill tools →

Popular JavaScript Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is codex-chatgpt-pro-plugin?

codex-chatgpt-pro-plugin is Give Codex an intelligence lifeline - Codex skill for calling ChatGPT Pro. Computer use, repomix file attach, thread isolation per repo.. It is categorized as a Codex Skill with 78 GitHub stars.

What programming language is codex-chatgpt-pro-plugin written in?

codex-chatgpt-pro-plugin is primarily written in JavaScript.

How do I install or use codex-chatgpt-pro-plugin?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the codex-chatgpt-pro-plugin GitHub repository at github.com/pauljunsukhan/codex-chatgpt-pro-plugin. The project has 78 stars and 8 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does codex-chatgpt-pro-plugin use?

codex-chatgpt-pro-plugin is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to codex-chatgpt-pro-plugin?

The top alternatives to codex-chatgpt-pro-plugin on Agent Skills Hub include theorist. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Codex Skill tools