by petrludwig-collab · Codex Skill · ★ 22
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 22 |
| Forks | 27 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | Codex Skill |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 77/100 |
| Open Issues | 5 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-21 |
| Created | 2026-06-20 |
| Platforms | claude-code, codex, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~16k |
Connect a coding agent (Claude Code, Codex, Antigravity) to Telegram. Dependency-free, robust, secure.
Looking for a Agent2Telegram alternative? If you're comparing Agent2Telegram with other codex skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
The open-source skill registry for AI coding agents. Create, manage, and distribute SKILL.md files across Open
Bridge between AI coding agents and your phone — notifications, 2-way chat, permissions
Define task-specific AI sub-agents in Markdown for any MCP-compatible tool.
Cross-LLM sub-agent orchestration as an Agent Skills. Route tasks to Codex, Claude Code, Grok, GLM, Kimi, Curs
Governance gateway for AI agents — bounded, auditable, session-aware control with MCP proxy, shell proxy & HTT
CodexFlow is a unified desktop workbench for AI coding agents (Codex/Claude/Gemini/Antigravity/Grok Build) acr
Explore other popular codex skill tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: