by phuryn · Codex Skill · ★ 171
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 171 |
| Forks | 7 |
| Language | JavaScript |
| Category | Codex Skill |
| Quality Score | 51/100 |
| Open Issues | 6 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-27 |
| Created | 2026-08-25 |
| Platforms | claude-code, cli, codex, gemini, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~18k |
Bug Hunt Bench — which AI coding model fixes the most real bugs? 105 real bugs, hidden in two production codebases. Frontier coding models — GPT-6, Claude, Grok, Gemini, DeepSeek, Kimi, GLM and more — get one round per repo in their own agentic CLI (Codex CLI, Claude Code, Grok CLI, Antigravity CLI) to find and fix what they can. Every diff is graded blind against a withheld answer key.
Looking for a bug-hunt-bench alternative? If you're comparing bug-hunt-bench with other codex skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
A local CLI, built on ccusage, that syncs your token usage with everyone else.
Awesome-LLM-Eval: a curated list of tools, datasets/benchmark, demos, leaderboard, papers, docs and models, ma
AI 编程福利导航：汇总 Claude Code、Codex、Cursor 中转站与公益站，整理免费额度、注册福利、签到活动和评测记录，提供可视化看板与 Python 数据采集工具。
Ultra-fast token & cost tracker for LLM Token Usage (e.g. Claude Code)
Find that one coding agent session you want to get back to!
Agent skills for Spec Kit
Explore other popular codex skill tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: