poco-claw — security grade SAFE, quality 65/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 65/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by poco-ai · Codex Skill · ★ 1.4k

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is poco-claw safe to install? View the security audit →

About poco-claw

Poco: Your Pocket Coworker A safer, more beautiful, and easier-to-use OpenClaw alternative English | 简体中文 Core Features Secure Sandbox All tasks run in an isolated container. Feel free to install dependencies, modify files, and execute commands — without affecting the host environment. More Than a Chatbot Supports Plan Mode, conversation queueing, conversation termination ... Project management: organize and switch between tasks and contexts more effectively File uploads: accept and work with multiple file formats Polished, Productive UI Artifacts view: render and preview many formats (HTML, PDF, Markdown, images, videos, Xmind, Excalidraw, Drawio, and more) Playback view: rep

agentaichatbotclaude-codeclawdbotmanusopenclaw

Quick Facts

Stars1,352
Forks128
LanguagePython
CategoryCodex Skill
LicenseMIT
Quality Score64.9921650347689/100
Open Issues1
Last Updated2026-09-22
Created2026-01-08
Platformsbrowser, claude-code, python
Est. Tokens~14k

poco-claw alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a poco-claw alternative? If you're comparing poco-claw with other codex skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • tokscale by junhoyeo · ⭐ 5.5k

    🛰️ Track token usage across AI coding agents from your terminal. 🏅 Global leaderboard with trillions of toke

  • openakita by openakita · ⭐ 2.0k

    An open-source AI assistant framework with skills and agent architecture

  • Wegent by wecode-ai · ⭐ 859

    Plan, build, and deliver with an open-source, self-hostable AI workspace for coding, collaboration, and automa

  • argo by xark-argo · ⭐ 827

    ARGO is an open-source AI Agent platform that brings Local Manus to your desktop. With one-click model downloa

  • AI-Infra-Guard by Tencent · ⭐ 6.4k

    A full-stack AI Red Teaming platform securing AI ecosystems via OpenClaw Security Scan, Agent Scan, Skills Sca

  • deepchat by ThinkInAIXYZ · ⭐ 6.3k

    🐬DeepChat - A smart assistant that connects powerful AI to your personal world

More Codex Skill Tools

Explore other popular codex skill tools:

View all Codex Skill tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is poco-claw?

poco-claw is A more beautiful and easier-to-use alternative to OpenClaw. It features a nicer Web UI, built-in IM support, a sandboxed runtime and channel-based team collaboration. Under the hood, it is powered by . It is categorized as a Codex Skill with 1.4k GitHub stars.

What programming language is poco-claw written in?

poco-claw is primarily written in Python. It covers topics such as agent, ai, chatbot.

How do I install or use poco-claw?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the poco-claw GitHub repository at github.com/poco-ai/poco-claw. The project has 1.4k stars and 128 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does poco-claw use?

poco-claw is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to poco-claw?

The top alternatives to poco-claw on Agent Skills Hub include tokscale, openakita, Wegent. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Codex Skill tools