by qybaihe · Codex Skill · ★ 42
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
🔒 Is codex-ppt safe to install? View the security audit →
codex-ppt is a codex skill by qybaihe.
No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
| Stars | 42 |
| Forks | 11 |
| Language | JavaScript |
| Category | Codex Skill |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 59.2015896102978/100 |
| Open Issues | 4 |
| Last Updated | 2026-07-09 |
| Created | 2026-04-27 |
| Platforms | codex, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~14k |
Looking for a codex-ppt alternative? If you're comparing codex-ppt with other codex skill tools, these 1 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
A Codex/Claude skill that maintains per-repo operating theory documents.
Explore other popular codex skill tools:
codex-ppt is an open-source codex skill by qybaihe with 42 GitHub stars.
codex-ppt is primarily written in JavaScript.
You can find installation instructions and usage details in the codex-ppt GitHub repository at github.com/qybaihe/codex-ppt. The project has 42 stars and 11 forks, indicating an active community.
codex-ppt is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.
The top alternatives to codex-ppt on Agent Skills Hub include theorist. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: