by railwayapp · MCP Server · ★ 191
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
npx -y @railway/mcp-serverTaken from the project's README on GitHub.
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 191 |
| Forks | 47 |
| Language | JavaScript |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 65/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-05-23 |
| Created | 2025-08-09 |
| Platforms | mcp, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~9k |
is deprecated Railway MCP is now bundled into the Railway CLI. This npm package no longer contains the standalone TypeScript MCP server. It is a compatibility shim that launches: Migration Install or upgrade the Railway CLI: Then configure supported MCP clients: To configure the hosted MCP server instead of the local stdio server: You can also configure a local MCP client directly with: Remove...
These tools work well together with railway-mcp-server for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a railway-mcp-server alternative? If you're comparing railway-mcp-server with other mcp server tools, these 1 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
The app framework built for AI coding agents. Own every line. Your AI already knows how to build on it.
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: