by sathish316 · Agent Tool · ★ 81
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
git clone https://github.com/sathish316/pied-piper.git
go install github.com/sathish316/pied-piperTaken from the project's README on GitHub. Check the security audit before running it.
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 81 |
| Forks | 1 |
| Language | Go |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 62/100 |
| Open Issues | 15 |
| Last Updated | 2026-08-05 |
| Created | 2025-11-20 |
| Platforms | claude-code, cli, docker, go |
| Est. Tokens | ~18k |
Overview Pied Piper is a team of AI SubAgents that can autonomously or semi-autonomously work on long-running coding tasks with full End-to-end tracking and human-in-the-loop approvals. These SubAgents run on Coding Agents (like Claude Code CLI), Docker, Cloud Desktop etc, so they can work even while you're AFK or sleeping or on vacation.
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: