by savka777 · Agent Tool · ★ 6
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 6 |
| Forks | 1 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 70/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-09-20 |
| Created | 2026-09-19 |
| Platforms | browser, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~11k |
Fast deep research for the pi coding agent: reads up to 100 pages in full per round, Jev keeps only the passages that answer your questions.
Looking for a jev-search alternative? If you're comparing jev-search with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
An unofficial local visualizer for Jev (TypeSafe): a live view of every call your code makes. Not affiliated w
Autonomous AI backend for deep research AI applications.
You.com skills and plugins for web search, content extraction, research, finance, and integration discovery, h
Cerno is a local-first research platform that leverages agentic AI to break down complex queries into verifiab
A Telegram bot that proves you don't need a body to have a personality. Works with any OpenAI-compatible LLM;
Agent skills that give AI agents live web data — search, scrape, and extract structured data with Extraction T
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: