Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 14 |
| Forks | 2 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | AI Tool |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 60/100 |
| Open Issues | 8 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-22 |
| Created | 2026-09-19 |
| Platforms | browser, cli, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~16k |
Plain-English browser e2e tests cheap enough to run on every PR. Built on Jev and Playwright, open source, bring your own key.
Looking for a sedum alternative? If you're comparing sedum with other ai tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
MCP server that lets AI assistants automate, debug and screenshot any Electron app over the Chrome DevTools Pr
Clawome - AI Agent Browser | Smart Web Browsing Tool Give your AI agent eyes and hands on any website. Open-so
Describe what you want. Go home. Sandcastle ships it. 6 AI providers, EU data residency, smart failover, cost
Give your AI agent accurate economic data. 330K indicators from FRED, World Bank, IMF, Eurostat & more. MCP se
Advanced Claude Code CLI toolkit - agents, hooks, skills, MCP servers, phased development, site intelligence d
Anti-detection browser MCP server for AI agents — navigate, interact, and automate the web without getting blo
Explore other popular ai tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: