by seekrays · MCP Server · ★ 91
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
git clone https://github.com/seekrays/mcp-monitor.gitTaken from the project's README on GitHub. Check the security audit before running it.
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 91 |
| Forks | 17 |
| Language | Go |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | Apache-2.0 |
| Quality Score | 74/100 |
| Last Updated | 2025-08-02 |
| Created | 2025-03-19 |
| Platforms | go, mcp |
| Est. Tokens | ~53k |
MCP System Monitor A system monitoring tool that exposes system metrics via the Model Context Protocol (MCP). This tool allows LLMs to retrieve real-time system information through an MCP-compatible interface.
Looking for a mcp-monitor alternative? If you're comparing mcp-monitor with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
🏠 Tells you what changed on your server — only what's worth telling. Single Go binary, no database, nothing r
🔥 Lightweight, Airbrake/Sentry-compatible, PostgreSQL-based Open Source Error Catcher
🐘 Give AI assistants full PostgreSQL DBA superpowers — 30+ tools for performance analysis, bloat detection, l
MCP Security Solution for Agentic AI — real-time proxying, behavior analysis, and malicious tool detection
10 Claude sessions running. What are they doing? Live dashboard — monitor, cost tracking, search, sub-agent vi
Multiplatform system monitoring tool using Cosmopolitan Libc
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: