semdecide — security grade SAFE, quality 73/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 73/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by sharziki · Agent Tool · ★ 75

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is semdecide safe to install? View the security audit →

About semdecide

SemDecide Typed semantic decisions for Unix pipelines and CI, powered by TypeSafe AI Jev. SemDecide is for meaning and for judgment. Pipe in text or JSONL and get a predicate, route, score, filtered stream, and stable process exit code without writing prompt, parsing, retry, or confidence-handling glue. Why Exact string rules cannot express concepts such as: “This customer is likely to churn.” “This change introduces a breaking API behavior.” “This record may describe account takeover.” “This response is grounded and complete.” General-purpose LLM calls can make those judgments, but they are awkward to place in shell scripts. They generate text that must be parsed, are comparatively slow and expensive, and often hide uncertainty. Jev returns typed decisions instead. SemDecide gives those decisions predictable Unix input, output, limits, retries, schemas, and exit behavior. Install SemDecide requires Python 3.10 or newer. SemDecide is not yet published on PyPI. The commands above install the signed

aiciclijevsemanticunix

Quick Facts

Stars75
Forks10
LanguagePython
CategoryAgent Tool
LicenseMIT
Quality Score72.7234144163867/100
Last Updated2026-09-16
Created2026-09-16
Platformscli, python
Est. Tokens~4k

semdecide alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a semdecide alternative? If you're comparing semdecide with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • ClaudeR by IMNMV · ⭐ 346

    Connect RStudio to Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, and other LLM agents via MCP. Multi-agent orchestration, automa

  • funzzy by cristianoliveira · ⭐ 294

    Gives developers and coding agents one reliable edit loop

  • sudocode by sudocode-ai · ⭐ 292

    Lightweight agent orchestration dev tool that lives in your repo

  • mcp-server-atlassian-bitbucket by aashari · ⭐ 162

    Node.js/TypeScript MCP server for Atlassian Bitbucket. Enables AI systems (LLMs) to interact with workspaces,

  • claude-code-open by kill136 · ⭐ 158

    Open source AI coding platform with Web IDE, multi-agent system, 37+ tools, MCP protocol. MIT licensed.

  • neurolink by juspay · ⭐ 142

    The pipe layer of an AI nervous system — one interface connecting provider neurons to your application, across

More Agent Tool Tools

Explore other popular agent tool tools:

View all Agent Tool tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is semdecide?

semdecide is Typed semantic decisions for Unix pipelines and CI, powered by TypeSafe AI Jev.. It is categorized as a Agent Tool with 75 GitHub stars.

What programming language is semdecide written in?

semdecide is primarily written in Python. It covers topics such as ai, ci, cli.

How do I install or use semdecide?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the semdecide GitHub repository at github.com/sharziki/semdecide. The project has 75 stars and 10 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does semdecide use?

semdecide is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to semdecide?

The top alternatives to semdecide on Agent Skills Hub include ClaudeR, funzzy, sudocode. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Agent Tool tools