by shizhl · Agent Tool · ★ 214
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 214 |
| Forks | 2 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| Quality Score | 68/100 |
| Open Issues | 1 |
| Last Updated | 2024-03-26 |
| Created | 2024-02-13 |
| Platforms | python |
| Est. Tokens | ~31k |
CoAgents The code for "cooperative and interactive agents framework" We propose the ConAgents, a Cooperative and interactive agents framework . The grounding agent generates tool-use instructions while execution agent executes selected tools. The observing agent extracts relevant values from execution results.
Looking for a CoAgents alternative? If you're comparing CoAgents with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
ToolOrchestra is an end-to-end RL training framework for orchestrating tools and agentic workflows.
This is the repository for the Tool Learning survey.
Aser is a lightweight, self-assembling AI Agent frame.
An introduction to the world of AI Agents
🚀 JoySafeter: An enterprise AI Agent Platform—Not just chatting. building、running、testing, and tracing autono
[ICLR'24 Spotlight] A language model (LM)-based emulation framework for identifying the risks of LM agents wit
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: