by sidharthrajaram · MCP Server · ★ 300
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
npx -y @smithery/cli install @sidharthrajaram/mcp-sse --client claudeTaken from the project's README on GitHub.
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 300 |
| Forks | 55 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | MCP Server |
| Quality Score | 73/100 |
| Open Issues | 10 |
| Last Updated | 2025-03-06 |
| Created | 2025-01-27 |
| Platforms | cli, mcp, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~1k |
SSE-based Server and Client for MCP This demonstrates a working pattern for SSE-based MCP servers and standalone MCP clients that use tools from them. Based on an original discussion here. Usage Note: Make sure to supply in or as an environment variable.
Looking for a mcp-sse alternative? If you're comparing mcp-sse with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
A curated collection of top-tier penetration testing tools and productivity utilities across multiple domains.
A set of tools that gives agents powerful capabilities.
The Simple Agent Development Kit.
CUGA is an open-source generalist agent harness for the enterprise, supporting complex task execution on web a
Easily create LLM tools and agents using plain Bash/JavaScript/Python functions.
Your personal AI assistant, running on your own computer. Long-running tasks, real memory, proactive help, voi
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: