Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 16 |
| Forks | 0 |
| Language | HTML |
| Category | AI Tool |
| Quality Score | 68/100 |
| Open Issues | 20 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-07 |
| Created | 2025-12-31 |
| Platforms | cli |
| Est. Tokens | ~18k |
A blazing-fast, multi-language linter for detecting AI-generated code slop
Looking for a antislop alternative? If you're comparing antislop with other ai tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
The code quality toolkit for the agentic AI era. Find dead code, clones, and scaffolding across 15 languages.
Cross-language-safe code-intelligence MCP for AI agents: 13 languages, family-gated call graph, blast radius,
AST knowledge graph MCP server for Claude Code — semantic search, call graph traversal, HTTP route tracing, im
A Context Compiler for TypeScript. Deterministic, diffable architectural contracts and dependency graphs for A
Prettier for localization, automatically convert React and Next.js apps into multilingual applications FAST.
A runtime-free MCP server that converts source code into AST🌲, regardless of language.
Explore other popular ai tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: