by sourcebot-dev · Agent Tool · ★ 4.0k
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 4,020 |
| Forks | 378 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 68/100 |
| Open Issues | 96 |
| Last Updated | 2026-11-04 |
| Created | 2024-08-23 |
| Platforms | python |
| Est. Tokens | ~14k |
Self Host · Public Demo Docs · Roadmap · Report Bug · Feature Request · Changelog <img src="https://img.shields.io/github/stars/so
These tools work well together with sourcebot for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a sourcebot alternative? If you're comparing sourcebot with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Code search MCP for Claude Code. Make entire codebase the context for any coding agent.
Exa MCP for web search and web crawling!
A super light-weight embedded code search engine CLI (AST based) that just works - improves speed and efficie
Symbol-level code retrieval for AI agents: fetch the function you need, not the whole file. Runs locally. 94.5
Semantic Search & Call Graphs for AI Agents (100% Local)
100% Rust implementation of code graphRAG with blazing fast AST+FastML parsing, surrealDB backend and advanced
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: