by steipete · Agent Tool · ★ 255
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
# Tachikoma — Swift AI SDK Modern, Swift-native APIs for text, vision, tools, and realtime voice. Install Swift Package Manager: Quick Start Streaming
| Stars | 255 |
| Forks | 33 |
| Language | Swift |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 55.738/100 |
| Open Issues | 5 |
| Last Updated | 2026-05-04 |
| Created | 2025-08-02 |
| Est. Tokens | ~189k |
Looking for a Tachikoma alternative? If you're comparing Tachikoma with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
A database of SDKs, frameworks, libraries, and tools for creating, monitoring, debugging and deploying autonom
🌋 Build AI agents that seamlessly combine LLM reasoning with real-world actions via MCP tools — in just a few
MCPSharp is a .NET library that helps you build Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers and clients - the standar
We handle what engineers and IDEs won't: generating and maintaining technical documentation for your codebase,
The Nexus SDK is a set of tools to help facilitate developers building with Nexus, the Agentic Workflow Engine
mkinf SDK to interact with mkinf hub MCP servers
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Tachikoma is One interface, every AI model. A Swift SDK to interface with AI providers.. It is categorized as a Agent Tool with 255 GitHub stars.
Tachikoma is primarily written in Swift. It covers topics such as ai, sdk, swift.
You can find installation instructions and usage details in the Tachikoma GitHub repository at github.com/steipete/Tachikoma. The project has 255 stars and 33 forks, indicating an active community.
Tachikoma is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.
The top alternatives to Tachikoma on Agent Skills Hub include awesome-ai-sdks, volcano-agent-sdk, MCPSharp. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.