homebrew-tap — security grade SAFE, quality 64/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 64/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by steipete · AI Tool · ★ 126

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is homebrew-tap safe to install? View the security audit →

About homebrew-tap

steipete’s Homebrew Tap Homebrew tap for shipping my CLI tools + a few macOS apps. Install Install Packages Packages Formulae — Play, group, and automate BluOS — Local Twitter memory for archives, DMs, likes, bookmarks, and moderation — One command to grab frames, clips, or motion alerts from RTSP/ONVIF cams — CodexBar CLI (Linuxbrew) — Discord archive CLI for local SQLite search and analysis — Google CLI for Gmail, Calendar, Drive, and Contacts — Grep the GIF. Stick the landing. — Send and read iMessage / SMS from the terminal — Model Context Protocol runtime and CLI generator (: per-server tool filtering, sturdier stdio shutdown, OAuth polish) — Bundle prompts + files for second-model review — Multi-provider order CLI (Foodora, Deliveroo) — Lightning-fast macOS screenshots & AI vision analysis — Universal file watcher with auto-rebuild for any language or build system — Command-line ElevenLabs TTS with mac-style flags — Control Sonos speakers from the command line — Spectral visualization CLI for audio files — Live tmux dashboard with Bubble Tea UI — WhatsApp CLI built on whatsmeow — R

homebrew

Quick Facts

Stars126
Forks33
LanguageRuby
CategoryAI Tool
Quality Score64.4828452138918/100
Last Updated2026-09-20
Created2025-07-03
Platformsruby
Est. Tokens~14k

homebrew-tap alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a homebrew-tap alternative? If you're comparing homebrew-tap with other ai tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • omni by fajarhide · ⭐ 370

    Your agent pays twice for output it has already seen. OMNI returns a handle instead: 97.2% off a file read twi

  • gptree by travisvn · ⭐ 290

    A CLI tool to provide LLM context for coding projects by combining project files into a single text file (or c

  • code-notify by mylee04 · ⭐ 288

    Cross-platform desktop notifications for Claude Code, Codex, and Gemini CLI. Install via Homebrew, npm, or scr

  • tokf by mpecan · ⭐ 196

    Config-driven CLI tool that compresses command output before it reaches an LLM context

  • skill-manager by mode-io · ⭐ 114

    Manage skills across Codex CLI, Claude Code, Cursor, OpenCode, and OpenClaw from one local app.

  • homebrew-pandafilter by AssafWoo · ⭐ 100

    The context intelligence layer for AI coding agents. Compressing noise, routing content to the right strategy,

More AI Tool Tools

Explore other popular ai tool tools:

View all AI Tool tools →

Popular Ruby Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is homebrew-tap?

homebrew-tap is Homebrew tap for steipete's tools. It is categorized as a AI Tool with 126 GitHub stars.

What programming language is homebrew-tap written in?

homebrew-tap is primarily written in Ruby. It covers topics such as homebrew.

How do I install or use homebrew-tap?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the homebrew-tap GitHub repository at github.com/steipete/homebrew-tap. The project has 126 stars and 33 forks, indicating an active community.

What are the best alternatives to homebrew-tap?

The top alternatives to homebrew-tap on Agent Skills Hub include omni, gptree, code-notify. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse AI Tool tools