wacrawl — security grade SAFE, quality 66/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 66/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by steipete · AI Tool · ★ 138

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is wacrawl safe to install? View the security audit →

About wacrawl

🧾 wacrawl WhatsApp archaeology with encrypted receipts. Read-only local archive and search for the macOS WhatsApp Desktop app. copies WhatsApp Desktop's local SQLite databases into a temporary snapshot, imports the useful chat data into its own SQLite archive, and gives you scriptable commands for status, chat listing, message listing, and full-text search. It is for local inspection. It does not send messages, decrypt backups, talk to WhatsApp Web, or write back into WhatsApp's app container. Install Homebrew is the easiest path. Install directly from the OpenClaw tap: After that, upgrades stay simple: Or from source: Check the installed binary: Quick Start First, check whether can see the local WhatsApp Desktop data: Sync a fresh local archive: Inspect what was imported. Read commands sync automatically by default, so , , , and refresh the archive before reading when the local WhatsApp Desktop source is newer: Search message text: bash wacrawl search "rele

Quick Facts

Stars138
Forks18
LanguageGo
CategoryAI Tool
LicenseMIT
Quality Score66.4118451586435/100
Open Issues2
Last Updated2026-05-28
Created2026-04-25
Platformsgo
Est. Tokens~11k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with wacrawl for enhanced workflows:

  • whatsapp-cli — semantic(0.43)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (60%)
  • whatsapp-mcp — semantic(0.27)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (55%)
  • openclaw-kapso-whatsapp — semantic(0.22)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (53%)
  • open-bsp-api — semantic(0.34)+complementary+similar_pop (47%)
  • agent-skills — semantic(0.33)+complementary+similar_pop (46%)

wacrawl alternative? Top 5 similar tools

Looking for a wacrawl alternative? If you're comparing wacrawl with other ai tool tools, these 5 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • MedgeClaw by xjtulyc · ⭐ 668

    Open-source AI research assistant for biomedicine — chat to run RNA-seq, drug discovery, clinical analysis, an

  • SciToolAgent by HICAI-ZJU · ⭐ 416

    SciToolAgent: A Knowledge Graph-Driven Scientific Agent for Multi-Tool Integration

  • redesigned-pancake by Sfedfcv · ⭐ 256

    Skip to content github / docs Code Issues 80 Pull requests 35 Discussions Actions Projects 2 Security Insights

  • claude-code-voice-skill by abracadabra50 · ⭐ 169

    Skill to talk to Claude about your projects over the phone

  • maui-skills by davidortinau · ⭐ 163

    .NET MAUI skills for GitHub Copilot and Claude Code

More AI Tool Tools

Explore other popular ai tool tools:

View all AI Tool tools →

Popular Go Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is wacrawl?

wacrawl is 🧾 WhatsApp archaeology with encrypted receipts. It is categorized as a AI Tool with 138 GitHub stars.

What programming language is wacrawl written in?

wacrawl is primarily written in Go.

How do I install or use wacrawl?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the wacrawl GitHub repository at github.com/steipete/wacrawl. The project has 138 stars and 18 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does wacrawl use?

wacrawl is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to wacrawl?

The top alternatives to wacrawl on Agent Skills Hub include MedgeClaw, SciToolAgent, redesigned-pancake. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse AI Tool tools