by superloglabs · Agent Tool · ★ 1.5k
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 1,469 |
| Forks | 117 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| License | Apache-2.0 |
| Quality Score | 72/100 |
| Open Issues | 83 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-23 |
| Created | 2026-06-02 |
| Platforms | node |
| Est. Tokens | ~14k |
Website · Code · Skills · Helpers · Disc
These tools work well together with superlog for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a superlog alternative? If you're comparing superlog with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Memory library for building stateful agents
Open-source Next.js template for building apps that are fully generated by AI. By E2B.
A memory OS that makes your OpenClaw agents more personal while saving tokens.
A Go framework for building production agent systems with graph workflows, tools, memory, A2A, AG-UI, MCP, eva
Route, manage, and analyze your LLM requests across multiple providers with a unified API interface.
Flow-Like: Strongly Typed Enterprise Scale Workflows. Built for scalability, speed, seamless AI integration an
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: