by swimmwatch · MCP Server · ★ 172
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
npx -y cloakbrowser-mcp@latest
npx -y cloakbrowser-mcp@latest doctorTaken from the project's README on GitHub.
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 172 |
| Forks | 20 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 72/100 |
| Open Issues | 4 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-24 |
| Created | 2026-05-21 |
| Platforms | browser, docker, mcp, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~17k |
cloakbrowser-mcp [](https://github.com
These tools work well together with cloakbrowser-mcp for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a cloakbrowser-mcp alternative? If you're comparing cloakbrowser-mcp with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Native Safari browser automation for AI agents. 98 tools via AppleScript — zero overhead, keeps logins, runs s
🌐Web Agent Protocol (WAP) - Record and replay user interactions in the browser with MCP support
MCPSafari: Native Safari MCP Server for AI Agents
Read, write, search, and surgically edit Obsidian vault notes, tags, and frontmatter via MCP. STDIO or Streama
Anti-detection browser server for AI agents — REST API wrapping Camoufox engine with OpenClaw plugin support
Anti-detection browser MCP server for AI agents — navigate, interact, and automate the web without getting blo
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: