web-agent-protocol — security grade SAFE, quality 71/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 71/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by OTA-Tech-AI · MCP Server · ★ 509

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is web-agent-protocol safe to install? View the security audit →

About web-agent-protocol

Web Agent Protocol Overview The Web Agent Protocol (WAP) is a standardized framework designed to enable seamless interaction between users, web agents, and browsers by recording and replaying browser actions. It separates the concerns of action recording and execution, allowing for efficient automation and reusability. The Python SDK for WAP implements the full specification, making it easy to: Collect user‑interaction data with the OTA‑WAP Chrome extension. Convert the raw event stream into either exact‑replay or smart‑replay act

ai-agentsai-toolsbrowser-automationbrowser-usellmmcpmcp-servermodelcontextprotocolplaywrightpython

Quick Facts

Stars509
Forks90
LanguagePython
CategoryMCP Server
LicenseMIT
Quality Score71.1868622329876/100
Open Issues11
Last Updated2025-06-19
Created2025-05-17
Platformsbrowser, mcp, python
Est. Tokens~364k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with web-agent-protocol for enhanced workflows:

  • browser-use — semantic(0.42)+complementary+rare_topics+same_lang+shared_platform (64%)
  • Clawome — semantic(0.28)+complementary+rare_topics+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (59%)
  • browserable — semantic(0.44)+complementary+rare_topics+similar_pop+shared_platform (59%)
  • LiteWebAgent — semantic(0.26)+complementary+rare_topics+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (59%)

web-agent-protocol alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a web-agent-protocol alternative? If you're comparing web-agent-protocol with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • browserable by browserable · ⭐ 1.2k

    Open source and self-hostable browser automation library for AI agents

  • Interceptor by Hacker-Valley-Media · ⭐ 419

    Browser automation and computer use for AI agents. One CLI and MCP server for your signed-in browser, native m

  • cheatengine-mcp-bridge by miscusi-peek · ⭐ 1.2k

    Connect Cursor, Copilot & Claude AI directly to Cheat Engine via MCP. Automate reverse engineering, pointer sc

  • browsernode by leoning60 · ⭐ 1.0k

    🌐 Make websites accessible for AI agents. Automate tasks online with ease.

  • octocode-mcp by bgauryy · ⭐ 838

    MCP server for semantic code research and context generation on real-time using LLM patterns | Search naturall

  • maverick-mcp by wshobson · ⭐ 668

    MaverickMCP - Personal Stock Analysis MCP Server

More MCP Server Tools

Explore other popular mcp server tools:

View all MCP Server tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is web-agent-protocol?

web-agent-protocol is 🌐Web Agent Protocol (WAP) - Record and replay user interactions in the browser with MCP support. It is categorized as a MCP Server with 509 GitHub stars.

What programming language is web-agent-protocol written in?

web-agent-protocol is primarily written in Python. It covers topics such as ai-agents, ai-tools, browser-automation.

How do I install or use web-agent-protocol?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the web-agent-protocol GitHub repository at github.com/OTA-Tech-AI/web-agent-protocol. The project has 509 stars and 90 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does web-agent-protocol use?

web-agent-protocol is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to web-agent-protocol?

The top alternatives to web-agent-protocol on Agent Skills Hub include browserable, Interceptor, cheatengine-mcp-bridge. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse MCP Server tools