by truffle-ai · MCP Server · ★ 659
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
git clone https://github.com/truffle-ai/dexto.git
npx dexto --mode mcp --agent coding-agent --auto-approve --no-elicitationTaken from the project's README on GitHub. Check the security audit before running it.
Flagged: opens a tunnel service. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 659 |
| Forks | 89 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | MCP Server |
| Quality Score | 69/100 |
| Open Issues | 94 |
| Last Updated | 2026-11-06 |
| Created | 2025-03-24 |
| Platforms | cli, mcp, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~19k |
Deutsch | English | Español | français | 日本語 | 한국어 | Português | Русский | 中文 An open agent harness
Looking for a dexto alternative? If you're comparing dexto with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Easily create LLM tools and agents using plain Bash/JavaScript/Python functions.
AI agent microservice
Create AI Agents in a No-Code Visual Builder or TypeScript SDK with full 2-way sync. For shipping AI assistant
A list of open-source AI projects you can use to generate income easily.
OpenClaw-inspired autonomous AI agent built entirely in n8n. Adaptive RAG-powered memory, Skills via MCP templ
🌐Web Agent Protocol (WAP) - Record and replay user interactions in the browser with MCP support
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: