jevyoumean: Semantic Did you mean

by syumai · AI Tool · ★ 16

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 70/100

None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.

jevjev-ai

Quick Facts

Stars16
Forks1
LanguageGo
CategoryAI Tool
LicenseMIT
Quality Score70/100
Open Issues3
Last Updated2026-10-21
Created2026-09-21
Platformscli, go
Est. Tokens~17k

About jevyoumean

Semantic "Did you mean?" for any CLI — wraps commands and uses TypeSafe's Jev to match subcommand typos by intent, not edit distance.

jevyoumean alternative? Top 2 similar tools

Looking for a jevyoumean alternative? If you're comparing jevyoumean with other ai tool tools, these 2 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • jeview by andududu · ⭐ 65

    An unofficial local visualizer for Jev (TypeSafe): a live view of every call your code makes. Not affiliated w

  • Canny by qkal · ⭐ 50

    Stops AI coding agents from claiming work is done without evidence. Deterministic hooks decide, TypeSafe's Jev

More AI Tool Tools

Explore other popular ai tool tools:

View all AI Tool tools →

Popular Go Agent Tools

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse AI Tool tools