by taichengguo · Agent Tool · ★ 1.3k
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 1,335 |
| Forks | 73 |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| Quality Score | 51/100 |
| Open Issues | 2 |
| Last Updated | 2026-11-07 |
| Created | 2024-01-05 |
| Est. Tokens | ~20k |
🤖 Awesome LLM-based Multi-Agents Papers 🔥 Paper 🔥 🔥Our Survey Paper Our survey about LLM based Multi-Agents is available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.01680 Our summarized LLM-based Multi-Agents architecture is: The Overview table is as follows. More details can be seen in our paper. Very appreciate any suggestions.
Looking for a LLM_MultiAgents_Survey_Papers alternative? If you're comparing LLM_MultiAgents_Survey_Papers with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
A systematic AI Agent development tutorial covering LLM agents, RAG, tool use, memory systems, multi-agent sys
This is the repository for the Tool Learning survey.
TPAMI 2026 | This repository collects awesome survey, resource, and paper for lifelong learning LLM agents
Adversary simulation and Red teaming platform with AI
An Agentic Framework for Reflective PowerPoint Generation
AG2 (formerly AutoGen): The Open-Source AgentOS.Join us at: https://discord.gg/sNGSwQME3x
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: