by tangxiangru · Agent Tool · ★ 806
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 806 |
| Forks | 25 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| Quality Score | 55/100 |
| Open Issues | 2 |
| Last Updated | 2026-08-24 |
| Created | 2026-03-13 |
| Platforms | claude-code, cli, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~25k |
AutoR: A Recursive Research System It proposes, tests, and tries to refute itself. The approval gate is the one thing it does not own — by default, that is you. Start here: English Guide · 中文教程 · Full Documentation
These tools work well together with AutoR for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a AutoR alternative? If you're comparing AutoR with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
AI handles execution, humans own the direction, and every run becomes an inspectable research artifact on disk
🦞 ResearchClawBench: Evaluating AI Agents for Automated Research from Re-Discovery to New-Discovery
The missing linter and lsp for AI coding assistants. Validate CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, SKILL.md, hooks, MCP. Plug
A curated collection of resources for 🌌 Azure OpenAI, 🦙 LLMs (+RAG, Agents). Monthly Updates.
Manage MCP servers, skills and plugins across Claude Code, Codex, Cursor and more. Built-in marketplace, one-c
An introduction to the world of AI Agents
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: