by truskovskiyk · AI Tool · ★ 73
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 73 |
| Forks | 4 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | AI Tool |
| License | Apache-2.0 |
| Quality Score | 60/100 |
| Open Issues | 2 |
| Last Updated | 2023-04-18 |
| Created | 2023-04-16 |
| Platforms | python |
| Est. Tokens | ~8k |
pr-reviewer Streamline Your GitHub Pull Requests with AI, co-authored with GPT4. 🚀 Excited to announce our new open-source project: PR Review Bot, a GitHub Pull Request review bot powered by OpenAI's GPT-3.5-turbo! 🤖 PR Review Bot automatically reviews open PRs in your GitHub repository, providing helpful feedback and even approving or requesting changes based on the analysis of the PR text and...
Looking for a pr-reviewer alternative? If you're comparing pr-reviewer with other ai tool tools, these 3 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Skip to content github / docs Code Issues 80 Pull requests 35 Discussions Actions Projects 2 Security Insights
Skill to talk to Claude about your projects over the phone
.NET MAUI skills for GitHub Copilot and Claude Code
Explore other popular ai tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: