jevlike — security grade SAFE, quality 53/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 53/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by vinnylarouge · AI Tool · ★ 1.0k

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is jevlike safe to install? View the security audit →

About jevlike

Jevlike Train a small model that chooses among a changing list of text options. A Jev-like model takes a piece of text and a list of text options. It returns one probability for each option. It does this in one pass instead of writing an answer word by word. Jev is TypeSafe's commercial model for this kind of task. TypeSafe has not published its design. This repository is an independent starter model with the same input and output shape. Demo The same option-attention head can score controller buttons from image patches. This ten-second film joins two selected five-second windows: live combat on the seven Doom buttons, then a chess controller walking to and playing moves with five keys. The diagram shows the tensors used for each decision. The Doom window came from the supplied joint checkpoint, which averaged 0.60 kills and -97.50 reward across its ten recorded episodes. The chess window came from the stronger chess-only checkpoint, which scored 4 wins, 46 draws and 0 losses in 50 sampled games against a random mover, but 0 wins, 2 draws and 48 losses against Stockfish level 0. The windows were selected for activity and are not typical-play or competence claims.

Quick Facts

Stars1,039
Forks86
LanguagePython
CategoryAI Tool
LicenseMIT
Quality Score52.9544093864242/100
Open Issues5
Last Updated2026-09-16
Created2026-09-16
Platformspython
Est. Tokens~15k

jevlike alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a jevlike alternative? If you're comparing jevlike with other ai tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • axton-obsidian-visual-skills by axtonliu · ⭐ 3.6k

    Visual Skills Pack for Obsidian: generate Canvas, Excalidraw, and Mermaid diagrams from text with Claude Code

  • claudekit-skills by mrgoonie · ⭐ 2.2k

    All powerful skills of ClaudeKit.cc!

  • EDRSilencer by netero1010 · ⭐ 1.9k

    A tool uses Windows Filtering Platform (WFP) to block Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) agents from report

  • perf-map-agent by jvm-profiling-tools · ⭐ 1.7k

    A java agent to generate method mappings to use with the linux `perf` tool

  • shaping-skills by rjs · ⭐ 1.4k

    Skills I use with Claude for shaping

  • pivotnacci by blackarrowsec · ⭐ 725

    A tool to make socks connections through HTTP agents

More AI Tool Tools

Explore other popular ai tool tools:

View all AI Tool tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is jevlike?

jevlike is an open-source ai tool by vinnylarouge with 1.0k GitHub stars.

What programming language is jevlike written in?

jevlike is primarily written in Python.

How do I install or use jevlike?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the jevlike GitHub repository at github.com/vinnylarouge/jevlike. The project has 1.0k stars and 86 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does jevlike use?

jevlike is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to jevlike?

The top alternatives to jevlike on Agent Skills Hub include axton-obsidian-visual-skills, claudekit-skills, EDRSilencer. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse AI Tool tools