by vstorm-co · Codex Skill · ★ 25
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 25 |
| Forks | 3 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | Codex Skill |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 69/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-04-16 |
| Created | 2026-04-16 |
| Platforms | claude-code, codex, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~16k |
Content studio skill pack for coding agents — blog, social, slides, video, infographics — all brand-aware with built-in anti-slop. Works with Claude Code, Codex, and AGENTS.md.
Looking for a content-skills alternative? If you're comparing content-skills with other codex skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Edit Videos and Design Images with Claude code or Codex
Bring the Conductor spec-driven development methodology to any coding environment as skills.
Comprehensive configuration management for AI coding tools - Replicate my complete setup for Claude Code, Open
An LLM council that reviews your coding agent's every move
All-in-one Content OS: social scheduling and directory launch in one workspace. Calendar, kanban, and product
AI agents and Nix: parametrable skills/instructions and tools, packaged together in a reproducible and modular
Explore other popular codex skill tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: