by x18n-dev · MCP Server · ★ 690
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 690 |
| Forks | 12 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 68/100 |
| Open Issues | 7 |
| Last Updated | 2026-11-06 |
| Created | 2026-10-15 |
| Platforms | mcp, node, vscode |
| Est. Tokens | ~14k |
x18n Universal toolkits for linting, viewing and managing i18n for any frameworks. is the spiritual successor of i18n-ally, that generalizes its concepts into a framework-agnostic toolkit that runs everywhere with a more robust and extensible architecture. Usages You can use the package to check, analyze, and manage your i18n resources from the command line.
Looking for a x18n alternative? If you're comparing x18n with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
The missing linter and lsp for AI coding assistants. Validate CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, SKILL.md, hooks, MCP. Plug
Codebase intelligence for AI. Detects patterns & conventions + remembers decisions across sessions. MCP server
Claude Code LSP: enhance your Claude Code experience with non-IDE dependent LSP integration.
Lean Theorem Prover MCP
Claude Code Plugin Marketplace with LSP servers
Enable any LLM (e.g. Claude) to interactively debug any language for you via MCP and a VS Code Extension
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: