openclaw-docs — security grade SAFE, quality 62/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 62/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by yeuxuan · Codex Skill · ★ 744

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is openclaw-docs safe to install? View the security audit →

About openclaw-docs

OpenClaw 中文文档 | 源码剖析 · 安装教程 · AI 智能体框架 OpenClaw(原名 ClawdBot)是开源多通道 AI 智能体框架,支持 WhatsApp、Telegram、Discord、飞书等平台,可接入 Claude、GPT、DeepSeek、Ollama 等模型。本仓库是其完整中文文档站,276 篇深度教程,覆盖安装部署、源码剖析、Gateway 配置与 AI 核心框架解析。 📖 立即在线阅读 → openclaw-docs.dx3n.cn 📚 文档覆盖范围 本文档站包含 276 篇原创中文教程,分为 4 条学习主线: [→ 适配器索引](https://openclaw-docs.dx3n.cn/beginner-openclaw-gui

ai-agentchineseclawdbotdocumentationllmmulti-channelopenclawtelegram-bot-ai-assistantvitepresswhatsapp-bot

Quick Facts

Stars744
Forks108
LanguageJavaScript
CategoryCodex Skill
Quality Score62.2188532057681/100
Open Issues2
Last Updated2026-07-19
Created2026-02-19
Platformsnode
Est. Tokens~14k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with openclaw-docs for enhanced workflows:

  • awesome-openclaw-agents — semantic(0.20)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (57%)
  • awesome-openclaw — semantic(0.47)+complementary+rare_topics+similar_pop (56%)
  • secure-openclaw — semantic(0.31)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (56%)
  • CoWork-OS — semantic(0.44)+complementary+rare_topics+similar_pop+shared_platform (55%)
  • OpenClawChineseTranslation — semantic(0.54)+rare_topics+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (54%)

openclaw-docs alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a openclaw-docs alternative? If you're comparing openclaw-docs with other codex skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • moltis by moltis-org · ⭐ 2.9k

    A secure persistent personal agent server in Rust. One binary, sandboxed execution, multi-provider LLMs, voice

  • awesome-openclaw by SamurAIGPT · ⭐ 957

    A curated list of OpenClaw resources, tools, skills, tutorials & articles. OpenClaw (formerly Moltbot / Clawdb

  • lucid-memory by JasonDocton · ⭐ 158

    Memory for AI that works like yours—local, instant, persistent. 13x faster than Pinecone, 5x leaner than RAG.

  • Claude-Code-x-OpenClaw-Guide-Zh by KimYx0207 · ⭐ 3.5k

    从零到企业实战:Claude Code 官方编程神器 + OpenClaw 224K Stars 开源AI助手 | 双顶流中文教程 | 21篇教程 130000+字

  • project-golem by Arvincreator · ⭐ 637

    OS-level autonomous AI agent with long-term memory, multi-agent coordination, Titan Chronos scheduler & Moltbo

  • Overture by SixHq · ⭐ 630

    Overture is an open-source, locally running web interface delivered as an MCP (Model Context Protocol) server

More Codex Skill Tools

Explore other popular codex skill tools:

View all Codex Skill tools →

Popular JavaScript Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is openclaw-docs?

openclaw-docs is OpenClaw 中文文档站 | AI 智能体框架 源码剖析 安装教程 | WhatsApp Telegram Discord 飞书 多通道机器人. It is categorized as a Codex Skill with 744 GitHub stars.

What programming language is openclaw-docs written in?

openclaw-docs is primarily written in JavaScript. It covers topics such as ai-agent, chinese, clawdbot.

How do I install or use openclaw-docs?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the openclaw-docs GitHub repository at github.com/yeuxuan/openclaw-docs. The project has 744 stars and 108 forks, indicating an active community.

What are the best alternatives to openclaw-docs?

The top alternatives to openclaw-docs on Agent Skills Hub include moltis, awesome-openclaw, lucid-memory. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Codex Skill tools