by 3vilM33pl3 · Agent Tool · ★ 20
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 20 |
| Forks | 11 |
| Language | Rust |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| License | AGPL-3.0 |
| Quality Score | 64/100 |
| Open Issues | 28 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-18 |
| Created | 2026-03-16 |
| Platforms | rust |
| Est. Tokens | ~24k |
Codifix is a local-first memory system for coding agents and developers.
Looking for a codifix alternative? If you're comparing codifix with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Outcome-based persistent memory MCP server for Claude Code and OpenCode. Good advice promoted, bad advice demo
Local-first AI memory archive. Import ChatGPT, Claude, and Grok exports, generate semantic embeddings, and sea
A k9s-inspired CLI and TUI for managing Claude Code sessions — browse, search, inspect, and clean up your AI c
CLI-first MCP server for composer-based Kirby CMS projects — inspect blueprints/templates/plugins, interact wi
🤖 Community fork of Google's Gemini CLI for Qwen AI models. A powerful command-line tool that uses Alibaba Cl
Supercharge your Claude Code CLI experience with a powerful statusline that displays key session metrics (Git
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: