by EliaAlberti · Agent Tool · ★ 66
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
/plugin marketplace add EliaAlberti/jev-rules
/plugin install jev-rules@jev-rulesTaken from the project's README on GitHub. Check the security audit before running it.
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 66 |
| Forks | 12 |
| Language | JavaScript |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 64/100 |
| Open Issues | 1 |
| Last Updated | 2026-09-27 |
| Created | 2026-09-18 |
| Platforms | claude-code, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~17k |
Jev picks which of your rules apply to each prompt, so Claude only sees the ones that matter. A real Claude Code session, 40 seconds. Watch it in full quality (plays in the browser, phone or desktop). If you use Claude Code for a while, you end up with a pile of standing instructions: test the payment code, use British spelling, follow the deploy checklist.
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: