by FractalAIResearchLabs · Agent Tool · ★ 64
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 64 |
| Forks | 10 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 62/100 |
| Open Issues | 2 |
| Last Updated | 2025-10-07 |
| Created | 2025-09-09 |
| Platforms | browser, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~2022k |
Fathom-DeepResearch: Unlocking Long Horizon Information Retrieval And Synthesis For SLMs -
These tools work well together with Fathom-DeepResearch for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a Fathom-DeepResearch alternative? If you're comparing Fathom-DeepResearch with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
VT.ai - multimodal AI chat app with dynamic conversation routing
The Library for LLM-based multi-agent applications
Semantic layer on top of a graph database to provide an LLM with a set of robust tools to interact with the da
Awesome LLM Papers and repos on very comprehensive topics.
Turn topics, links, and files into AI-generated research notebooks — summarize, explore, and ask anything.
[NAACL2025] LiteWebAgent: The Open-Source Suite for VLM-Based Web-Agent Applications
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: