claude-pr-review: Multi-axis PR review orchestration for Claude Code — 5 independent review perspectives, symmetric

by GGGODLIN · Claude Skill · ★ 114

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 60/100

None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.

Quick Facts

Stars114
Forks10
LanguagePython
CategoryClaude Skill
LicenseMIT
Quality Score60/100
Last Updated2026-09-18
Created2026-08-11
Platformsclaude-code, python
Est. Tokens~17k

About claude-pr-review

claude-pr-review Multi-axis PR review orchestration for Claude Code — one command that runs up to five independent review perspectives against the same pull request, cross-verifies every finding between axes, and compiles a single comparison report with copy-paste-ready inline comments. Built and battle-tested over months of daily production PR review.

claude-pr-review alternative? Top 1 similar tools

Looking for a claude-pr-review alternative? If you're comparing claude-pr-review with other claude skill tools, these 1 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • claude-ai-mcp by anthropics · ⭐ 484

    Report issues related to MCP integration with Claude here.

More Claude Skill Tools

Explore other popular claude skill tools:

View all Claude Skill tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Claude Skill tools