LLM-Agent-Harness-Survey — security grade SAFE, quality 55/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 55/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by Gloriaameng · Agent Tool · ★ 77

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is LLM-Agent-Harness-Survey safe to install? View the security audit →

About LLM-Agent-Harness-Survey

English | 中文 Agent Harness for Large Language Model Agents: A Survey []() []() ⭐ This repo is actively maintained. If you find it useful, please star the repo to stay updated and help others find it. The agent execution harness — not the model — is the primary determinant of agent reliability at scale. This survey formalizes the harness as a first-class architectural object H = (E, T, C, S, L, V), surveys 110+ papers, blogs and reports across 23 systems, and maps 9 open technical challenges. 📄 Read the Paper 🌐 [Preprints Version (v3)](https://www.preprints.

agentagent-frameworkagent-harnessawesome-listharnessharness-engineeringllm

Quick Facts

Stars77
Forks0
CategoryAgent Tool
LicenseCC-BY-4.0
Quality Score54.5308580135315/100
Last Updated2026-04-14
Created2026-04-03
Est. Tokens~1862k

LLM-Agent-Harness-Survey alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a LLM-Agent-Harness-Survey alternative? If you're comparing LLM-Agent-Harness-Survey with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • omnicoreagent by omnirexflora-labs · ⭐ 246

    Open Python agent harness for production AI apps: tools, MCP, memory, workspace, telemetry, subagents, backgro

  • Autono by vortezwohl · ⭐ 212

    A ReAct-Based Highly Robust Autonomous Agent (Harness) Framework.

  • ai-agent-tools-catalog by GetStream · ⭐ 164

    Explore the must-have external ready-made toolkits to integrate with your AI agents built with Python and Type

  • Awesome-AI-For-Security by AmanPriyanshu · ⭐ 145

    A curated list of tools, papers, and datasets for applying AI to cybersecurity tasks. This list primarily focu

  • awesome-agent-skills by kodustech · ⭐ 96

    Curated list of Agent Skills for AI coding agents like Claude Code, Codex and Cursor.

  • SimpleLLMFunc by NiJingzhe · ⭐ 77

    A simple and well-tailored LLM application framework that enables you to seamlessly integrate LLM capabilities

More Agent Tool Tools

Explore other popular agent tool tools:

View all Agent Tool tools →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is LLM-Agent-Harness-Survey?

LLM-Agent-Harness-Survey is Survey on LLM agentharness engineering with a taxonomy. 110+ papers, 23 systems analyzed.. It is categorized as a Agent Tool with 77 GitHub stars.

How do I install or use LLM-Agent-Harness-Survey?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the LLM-Agent-Harness-Survey GitHub repository at github.com/Gloriaameng/LLM-Agent-Harness-Survey. The project has 77 stars and 0 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does LLM-Agent-Harness-Survey use?

LLM-Agent-Harness-Survey is released under the CC-BY-4.0 license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to LLM-Agent-Harness-Survey?

The top alternatives to LLM-Agent-Harness-Survey on Agent Skills Hub include omnicoreagent, Autono, ai-agent-tools-catalog. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Agent Tool tools