apple-motion — security grade SAFE, quality 62/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 62/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by IskakovDamir · Claude Skill · ★ 13

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is apple-motion safe to install? View the security audit →

About apple-motion

Claude skill for Apple-style kinetic typography recaps in Remotion, built from frame-accurate measurements of Apple recap videos

Quick Facts

Stars13
Forks17
LanguagePython
CategoryClaude Skill
LicenseMIT
Quality Score62.2507393580245/100
Last Updated2026-09-29
Created2026-09-28
Platformsclaude-code, python
Est. Tokens~16k

More Claude Skill Tools

Explore other popular claude skill tools:

View all Claude Skill tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is apple-motion?

apple-motion is Claude skill for Apple-style kinetic typography recaps in Remotion, built from frame-accurate measurements of Apple recap videos. It is categorized as a Claude Skill with 13 GitHub stars.

What programming language is apple-motion written in?

apple-motion is primarily written in Python.

How do I install or use apple-motion?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the apple-motion GitHub repository at github.com/IskakovDamir/apple-motion. The project has 13 stars and 17 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does apple-motion use?

apple-motion is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Claude Skill tools