by Lowcountry-AI · Agent Tool · ★ 7
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 7 |
| Forks | 0 |
| Language | Shell |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 63/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-05 |
| Created | 2026-07-29 |
| Platforms | claude-code, cli, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~3k |
Three small, independent guardrails for AI coding agents: an anti-AI-slop writing checklist, a code-comment hygiene checklist, and a standing multi-agent orchestration recipe hook.
Looking for a guardrail-skills alternative? If you're comparing guardrail-skills with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
🏛 [UNDER CONSTRUCTION] A (roman) claude plugin marketplace
Skills for AI coding agents — Laravel, PHP, React, TypeScript, testing, security, and code quality.
Governance-first orchestration for Claude Code, Codex, and Gemini CLI — parallel workers, receipts, quality ga
Automated loop driver, slash commands, council automation, MCP browser bridge, and portfolio governance for Cl
Comprehensive guide for writing professional Claude Standard prompts with MCP, Skills, and Superpowers integra
The code quality toolkit for the agentic AI era. Find dead code, clones, and scaffolding across 15 languages.
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: