by MaxwellCCC · Agent Tool · ★ 65
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 65 |
| Forks | 4 |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| Quality Score | 65/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-06-06 |
| Created | 2026-05-28 |
| Est. Tokens | ~3k |
Autonomous QA Loop English | 中文 A portable prompt pattern for running fresh, neutral QA agents in repeated loops. It works with coding agents that can review files, diffs, logs, test output, or generated artifacts, and helps complex vibe-coded projects keep surfacing new bugs instead of getting stuck in biased self-checks.
Looking for a autonomous-qa-loop alternative? If you're comparing autonomous-qa-loop with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Self-hosted framework for orchestrating fleets of specialist AI agents — ensemble reasoning and a full agentic
An LLM council that reviews your coding agent's every move
Multi-agent orchestration extension for Gemini CLI — 22 specialists, parallel subagents, persistent sessions,
A collection of AI agent skills for Clawdbot, Claude Code, Codex
Reusable project context and specialist workflows for the AI tools you already use. Agents, skills, rules and
HeyClaude (formerly Claude Pro Directory) is a searchable collection of pre-built AI skills, agents, MCP serve
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: