pushing-creation: Cinematic prompt methodology for AI image and video generation

by PUSHINGSQUARES · Claude Skill · ★ 12

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 68/100

None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.

ai-cinematographyclaude-codeclaude-skillscreative-directionprompt-engineering

Quick Facts

Stars12
Forks4
LanguagePython
CategoryClaude Skill
LicenseMIT
Quality Score68/100
Last Updated2026-05-12
Created2026-05-04
Platformsclaude-code, python
Est. Tokens~14k

About pushing-creation

Cinematic prompt methodology for AI image and video generation. Install into Claude Code, author director-grade style packs and storyboards from your reference images. Output is markdown, drop-in compatible with PUSHING FRAMES.

pushing-creation alternative? Top 2 similar tools

Looking for a pushing-creation alternative? If you're comparing pushing-creation with other claude skill tools, these 2 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • claude-prompt-engineering-guide by ThamJiaHe · ⭐ 83

    Comprehensive guide for writing professional Claude Standard prompts with MCP, Skills, and Superpowers integra

  • claude-emporium by Vvkmnn · ⭐ 82

    🏛 [UNDER CONSTRUCTION] A (roman) claude plugin marketplace

More Claude Skill Tools

Explore other popular claude skill tools:

View all Claude Skill tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Claude Skill tools