by Prism-Shadow · Codex Skill · ★ 546
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 546 |
| Forks | 30 |
| Language | JavaScript |
| Category | Codex Skill |
| Quality Score | 46/100 |
| Open Issues | 1 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-30 |
| Created | 2026-08-13 |
| Platforms | claude-code, codex, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~25k |
Our survey From Existing Methods to New Research Ideas: Two Perspectives on Recursive Self-Improvement A nine-dimension taxonomy of RSI methods and insights from traditional deep learning to inspire new research.
Looking for a awesome-rsi alternative? If you're comparing awesome-rsi with other codex skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
MOMO CODE — RSI *JEV*Pi --AI coding agent that evolves with you
🎓 Claude Code skill — AI prompt library for academic paper writing, polishing, reviewing, translating and sub
a recursive self-improving harness designed to help your agents (and future iterations of those agents) succee
Open-source desktop AI agent workspace with one-click Claude Code, Codex, OpenClaw, Hermes Agent setup and cus
AI handles execution, humans own the direction, and every run becomes an inspectable research artifact on disk
AI handles execution, humans own the direction, and every run becomes an inspectable research artifact on disk
Explore other popular codex skill tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: