by ProjectDXAI · Agent Tool · ★ 237
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 237 |
| Forks | 5 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 66/100 |
| Open Issues | 1 |
| Last Updated | 2026-08-07 |
| Created | 2026-03-30 |
| Platforms | claude-code, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~114k |
labrat English | 简体中文 is a local-first runtime that puts Claude Code or Codex on a real research problem with a scoreboard and enough structure to run for hours. Population search, not single-thread: families of ideas compete for compute budget, and the ones that produce real signal earn more room to keep going.
These tools work well together with labrat for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a labrat alternative? If you're comparing labrat with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Top Autonomous Research Multi-Agent System for 2026 Lab Experiments
Top Autonomous Research Multi-Agent System for 2026 Lab Experiments
Claude Code plugin for autonomous AI research — multi-agent loops take a bare topic all the way to running exp
An open-source research system for autonomous investigation, recursive self-improvement, and human–AI collabor
Autonomous AI backend for deep research AI applications.
Autonomous software engineering fleet of AI agents for production-grade PRs on AgentField: plan, code, test, a
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: