by Usaid22 · Agent Tool · ★ 90
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 90 |
| Forks | 0 |
| Language | HTML |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| Quality Score | 62/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-11-07 |
| Created | 2026-06-15 |
| Platforms | claude-code |
| Est. Tokens | ~17k |
🧪 LabRat Autonomous Multi-Agent Research Orchestrator Turn your research chaos into a symphony of intelligent agents. LabRat is not an experiment tracker. It is a self-organizing colony of AI research assistants that autonomously explore hypotheses, allocate market-style computational credits, and produce reproducible findings—all coordinated through a single YAML configuration.
These tools work well together with swarm-factory for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a swarm-factory alternative? If you're comparing swarm-factory with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Autonomous multi-branch research lab. Branches compete for compute budget. The system converges on what works.
Top Autonomous Research Multi-Agent System for 2026 Lab Experiments
Claude Code plugin for autonomous AI research — multi-agent loops take a bare topic all the way to running exp
An open-source research system for autonomous investigation, recursive self-improvement, and human–AI collabor
Autonomous AI backend for deep research AI applications.
Fully Autonomous AI Research System with Self-Evolution, built natively on Claude Code
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: