ProxmoxMCP-Plus — security grade SAFE, quality 72/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 72/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by RekklesNA · MCP Server · ★ 566

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is ProxmoxMCP-Plus safe to install? View the security audit →

About ProxmoxMCP-Plus

ProxmoxMCP-Plus Control Proxmox VE from LLMs, AI agents, MCP clients, and OpenAPI tooling with one safer interface for VMs, LXCs, backups, snapshots, ISOs, and container commands. Quick Start | Demo | Capabilities | Scenarios | Docs |

ai-agentautomationclaude-desktophomelabllmlxcmcpmodel-context-protocolopen-webuiopenapi

Quick Facts

Stars566
Forks92
LanguagePython
CategoryMCP Server
LicenseMIT
Quality Score72.1930491326499/100
Last Updated2026-10-01
Created2025-05-23
Platformsbrowser, claude-code, mcp, python
Est. Tokens~15k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with ProxmoxMCP-Plus for enhanced workflows:

  • SuperPowersWUI — semantic(0.22)+complementary+rare_topics+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (62%)
  • OpenWebui-Tools — semantic(0.31)+complementary+rare_topics+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (60%)
  • open-webui-tools — semantic(0.24)+complementary+rare_topics+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (58%)
  • open-terminal — semantic(0.27)+complementary+rare_topics+same_lang+shared_platform (54%)
  • Fileshed — semantic(0.20)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (52%)

ProxmoxMCP-Plus alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a ProxmoxMCP-Plus alternative? If you're comparing ProxmoxMCP-Plus with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • notion-mcp-server by awkoy · ⭐ 172

    Notion MCP server for Claude, Cursor, ChatGPT & Claude Desktop. Connect AI agents to Notion via Model Context

  • metamcp by metatool-ai · ⭐ 2.7k

    MCP Aggregator, Orchestrator, Middleware, Gateway in one docker

  • wcgw by rusiaaman · ⭐ 674

    Shell and coding agent on mcp clients

  • python-utcp by universal-tool-calling-protocol · ⭐ 650

    Official python implementation of UTCP. UTCP is an open standard that lets AI agents call any API directly, wi

  • Overture by SixHq · ⭐ 641

    Overture is an open-source, locally running web interface delivered as an MCP (Model Context Protocol) server

  • XActions by nirholas · ⭐ 559

    ⚡ The Complete X/Twitter Automation Toolkit — Scrapers, MCP server for AI agents (Claude/GPT), CLI, browser sc

More MCP Server Tools

Explore other popular mcp server tools:

View all MCP Server tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is ProxmoxMCP-Plus?

ProxmoxMCP-Plus is Use MCP and OpenAPI to safely control Proxmox VE VMs, LXCs, backups, and snapshots from LLMs and AI agents.. It is categorized as a MCP Server with 566 GitHub stars.

What programming language is ProxmoxMCP-Plus written in?

ProxmoxMCP-Plus is primarily written in Python. It covers topics such as ai-agent, automation, claude-desktop.

How do I install or use ProxmoxMCP-Plus?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the ProxmoxMCP-Plus GitHub repository at github.com/RekklesNA/ProxmoxMCP-Plus. The project has 566 stars and 92 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does ProxmoxMCP-Plus use?

ProxmoxMCP-Plus is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to ProxmoxMCP-Plus?

The top alternatives to ProxmoxMCP-Plus on Agent Skills Hub include notion-mcp-server, metamcp, wcgw. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse MCP Server tools