by RoggeOhta · MCP Server · ★ 505
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 505 |
| Forks | 208 |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | CC0-1.0 |
| Quality Score | 60/100 |
| Open Issues | 176 |
| Last Updated | 2026-09-06 |
| Created | 2026-03-31 |
| Platforms | claude-code, cli, codex, gemini, mcp |
| Est. Tokens | ~15k |
Awesome Codex CLI A curated list of awesome tools, skills, subagents, plugins, and resources for OpenAI Codex CLI - the open-source AI coding agent that runs in your terminal. Codex CLI is OpenAI's open-source terminal-based coding agent.
Looking for a awesome-codex-cli alternative? If you're comparing awesome-codex-cli with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Run Claude Code, Codex, and Gemini side by side — each in its own git worktree
The definitive resource for Agent Skills - modular capabilities revolutionizing AI agent architecture
Professional context and harness engineering for Claude Code and OpenAI Codex. Build production-grade software
A curated list of awesome LLM and AI Agent Skills, resources and tools for customising AI Agent workflows - th
The control plane for AI coding agents.
Engineering decisions engine that know when they're stale. Frame, compare, decide — with evidence decay and p
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: