by Teycir · Claude Skill · ★ 20
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 20 |
| Forks | 1 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | Claude Skill |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 63/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-07-27 |
| Created | 2026-07-25 |
| Platforms | claude-code, codex, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~20k |
A SKILL that turns a code diff into an evidence-backed ledger of hidden assumptions, failure modes, and falsification tests.
Looking for a Assumptions alternative? If you're comparing Assumptions with other claude skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Graph-based long-term memory skill for AI (LLM) coding agents — faster context, fewer tokens, safer refactors
Governance gateway for AI agents — bounded, auditable, session-aware control with MCP proxy, shell proxy & HTT
Skills for AI coding agents — Laravel, PHP, React, TypeScript, testing, security, and code quality.
A collection of Claude skills I have concocted to optimise my Ops/Product workflows.
Security testing toolkit for Claude Code: curated SecLists wordlists, injection payloads, and expert agents fo
A verification-first engineering toolkit for Claude Code. Built for senior ICs and tech leads who already know
Explore other popular claude skill tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: