Tiger — security grade SAFE, quality 69/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 69/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by Upsonic · Agent Tool · ★ 473

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is Tiger safe to install? View the security audit →

About Tiger

Tiger: Neuralink for your AI Agents Setup • Integrations: crewAI Integration • LangChain Integration • AutoGen Integration • Telegram Integration • Sources: Currently Tools • Custom Tools (On-Prem Docker) • Public Dashboard • What is Tiger? Tiger is a community-driven project developing a reusable and integrated tool ecosystem for LLM Agent Revolution. It utilizes Upsonic for isolated tool storage, profillibg and for the automatic generation of documents. With Tiger, you can create a customized environment for your agents or leverage the robust and publicly maintained Tiger 🐅 curated by the community itself. Details Tiger, influenced by Neuralink, provides an AI-oriented computer interface with threads connected to the LLM interface. It offers a platform for AIs to control a computer by simply 'thinking'. With Tiger, your LLM agents can write and execute code, use search engines, manage your calendar, control your mo

agentaifunction-callingllmneuralinktools

Quick Facts

Stars473
Forks43
LanguagePython
CategoryAgent Tool
LicenseMIT
Quality Score69.3016513092052/100
Open Issues5
Last Updated2025-02-19
Created2024-04-05
Platformspython
Est. Tokens~485k

Tiger alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a Tiger alternative? If you're comparing Tiger with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • awesome-ai-sdks by e2b-dev · ⭐ 1.2k

    A database of SDKs, frameworks, libraries, and tools for creating, monitoring, debugging and deploying autonom

  • blade-code by echoVic · ⭐ 179

    AI-powered CLI coding agent with 20+ built-in tools, MCP support, and multi-model providers

  • ai-agent-tools-catalog by GetStream · ⭐ 164

    Explore the must-have external ready-made toolkits to integrate with your AI agents built with Python and Type

  • superglue by superglue-ai · ⭐ 2.0k

    superglue (YC W25) builds integrations and tools from natural language. Get production-grade tools for long ta

  • AIaW by NitroRCr · ⭐ 1.8k

    AI as Workspace - An elegant AI chat client. Full-featured, lightweight. Support multiple workspaces, plugin s

  • ReCall by Agent-RL · ⭐ 1.4k

    ReSearch: Learning to Reason with Search for LLMs via Reinforcement Learning & ReCall: Learning to Reason with

More Agent Tool Tools

Explore other popular agent tool tools:

View all Agent Tool tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Tiger?

Tiger is Neuralink for your AI Agents - LangChain - Autogen - CrewAI. It is categorized as a Agent Tool with 473 GitHub stars.

What programming language is Tiger written in?

Tiger is primarily written in Python. It covers topics such as agent, ai, function-calling.

How do I install or use Tiger?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the Tiger GitHub repository at github.com/Upsonic/Tiger. The project has 473 stars and 43 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does Tiger use?

Tiger is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to Tiger?

The top alternatives to Tiger on Agent Skills Hub include awesome-ai-sdks, blade-code, ai-agent-tools-catalog. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Agent Tool tools