by Xiaooolong · AI Tool · ★ 19
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 19 |
| Forks | 3 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | AI Tool |
| License | Apache-2.0 |
| Quality Score | 63/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-05 |
| Created | 2026-09-30 |
| Platforms | python |
| Est. Tokens | ~17k |
Jev-like decision models that can also see images — open weights on Qwen3.5, run on your own GPU
These tools work well together with vev for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a vev alternative? If you're comparing vev with other ai tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Open-source alternative to TypeSafe's Jev: a System One style model layer that gives typed, calibrated decisio
Blazing fast, self-hosted structured decisions for open models with a TypeSafe AI compatible API, written in R
Ask your house a question, get a number back. Home Assistant integration for TypeSafe Jev: typed answers as se
An unofficial local visualizer for Jev (TypeSafe): a live view of every call your code makes. Not affiliated w
OmniAgent (ICML 2026): the first native omni-modal agent for active video perception — a 7B agent that beats Q
Code repo for the paper: Attacking Vision-Language Computer Agents via Pop-ups
Explore other popular ai tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: