by ZephyrDeng · Agent Tool · ★ 15
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 15 |
| Forks | 1 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 70/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-09-30 |
| Created | 2026-06-29 |
| Platforms | cli, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~16k |
Isolated AI-powered code and plan reviews from the command line
Looking for a pi-review alternative? If you're comparing pi-review with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Run your coding agents from Telegram. A bridge for Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode and Pi: send tasks by text or
CLI tool that generates commit messages from git changes, reviews code for quality issues, and provides debugg
Define task-specific AI sub-agents in Markdown for any MCP-compatible tool.
AI agents and Nix: parametrable skills/instructions and tools, packaged together in a reproducible and modular
Cross-LLM sub-agent orchestration as an Agent Skills. Route tasks to Codex, Claude Code, Grok, GLM, Kimi, Curs
Vendor-neutral MCP configuration manager — one CLI to add, toggle, and audit MCP servers and skills across eve
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: